He that hath the Son hath life; and he that hath not the Son of God hath not life. John presents the starkest possible contrast. "He that hath the Son hath life" (ho echōn ton huion echei tēn zōēn)—possessing Christ means possessing life. "Having the Son" means union with Christ through faith, not mere intellectual assent to facts about Him. The present tenses indicate current possession—believers have life now, not merely future hope. This echoes Jesus's teaching: "He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life" (John 3:36).
"And he that hath not the Son of God hath not life" (ho mē echōn ton huion tou theou tēn zōēn ouk echei). The negative is equally absolute—lacking Christ means lacking life, regardless of other religious beliefs, moral achievements, or sincere efforts. This isn't merely lacking future bliss but present spiritual death. Those without Christ exist physically but are spiritually dead (Ephesians 2:1), separated from God who is life's source.
This binary division allows no middle ground. You either have Christ and therefore have life, or lack Christ and therefore lack life. There's no third category—sincere seekers, good people, followers of other religions who might have some life without Christ. The division is absolute because life is exclusively in God's Son (v. 11). This exclusivity is offensive to modern pluralism but is biblical Christianity's unchangeable truth. It also clarifies evangelism's urgency—those without Christ are perishing, needing the gospel desperately.
Historical Context
This exclusive claim that life is only in Christ was Christianity's distinctive, countercultural assertion from the beginning. Acts records Peter proclaiming, "Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved" (Acts 4:12). Paul taught that Christ is the one mediator between God and man (1 Timothy 2:5). This exclusivity wasn't cultural arrogance but theological necessity—if salvation could come through other means, Christ's death was unnecessary (Galatians 2:21).
The early church's exclusive claims faced persecution from Rome, which tolerated many religions but demanded acknowledgment of Caesar and Roman gods. Christians' refusal, insisting on Christ alone, was considered atheism and disloyalty. Today's pluralistic culture similarly rejects Christianity's exclusive truth claims. Yet biblical Christianity cannot compromise this—Christ alone provides salvation; all other paths lead to death, however sincere or morally respectable they seem.
Questions for Reflection
How does this verse's stark either/or (have Christ and life, or lack Christ and life) challenge contemporary religious pluralism?
What does 'having the Son' mean practically beyond mere intellectual belief in facts about Jesus?
How should the truth that those without Christ 'have not life' affect your urgency in evangelism and your prayers for unbelievers?
Related Resources
Explore related topics, people, and study resources to deepen your understanding of this passage.
Analysis & Commentary
He that hath the Son hath life; and he that hath not the Son of God hath not life. John presents the starkest possible contrast. "He that hath the Son hath life" (ho echōn ton huion echei tēn zōēn)—possessing Christ means possessing life. "Having the Son" means union with Christ through faith, not mere intellectual assent to facts about Him. The present tenses indicate current possession—believers have life now, not merely future hope. This echoes Jesus's teaching: "He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life" (John 3:36).
"And he that hath not the Son of God hath not life" (ho mē echōn ton huion tou theou tēn zōēn ouk echei). The negative is equally absolute—lacking Christ means lacking life, regardless of other religious beliefs, moral achievements, or sincere efforts. This isn't merely lacking future bliss but present spiritual death. Those without Christ exist physically but are spiritually dead (Ephesians 2:1), separated from God who is life's source.
This binary division allows no middle ground. You either have Christ and therefore have life, or lack Christ and therefore lack life. There's no third category—sincere seekers, good people, followers of other religions who might have some life without Christ. The division is absolute because life is exclusively in God's Son (v. 11). This exclusivity is offensive to modern pluralism but is biblical Christianity's unchangeable truth. It also clarifies evangelism's urgency—those without Christ are perishing, needing the gospel desperately.